Comparison
Lexora vs Chiku AI
Chiku AI is an interview preparation and live-assistance tool aimed at candidates practising for technical and behavioural rounds.
| Capability | Lexora Interview | Chiku AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hidden from screen share & recording | ✓OS-level capture exclusion, macOS + Windows | Not stated |
| Time to first word | ~600ms | Not stated |
| Captures interviewer audio directly | ✓Core Audio process tap | Not stated |
| Native desktop app (not a browser tab) | ✓Rust + Tauri binary | Not stated |
| Answers grounded in your resume + JD | ✓Resume and job description both parsed | Not stated |
| Entry price | ₹49 | Not stated |
| Try before paying | ✓₹5 trial, 10 minutes | Not stated |
Competitor details last checked: Chiku AI — TODO — check chiku.ai and fill in. Cells marked “Not stated” are capabilities we could not confirm from public sources, not capabilities the product lacks. Trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Where Chiku AI is the better choice
- •Strong focus on structured interview practice and rehearsal, not only live sessions.
- •Useful for candidates who want to build answers ahead of time rather than improvise.
Where Lexora pulls ahead
- ✓Lexora is built for the live moment, not the rehearsal. The entire architecture — process-tap audio, streaming transcription, streaming generation — exists to shrink the gap between the question ending and your answer starting.
- ✓Our overlay is excluded from screen capture at the compositor level, so nothing changes about what the interviewer sees when you share.
- ✓Answers are grounded in your actual resume and the actual job description, so the specifics you cite match the document the interviewer is holding.
Still deciding?
Lexora starts at ₹49 with no subscription, so trying it costs less than the time you’d spend reading more comparison pages.